PROP 13
CELEBRATES 30 YEARS OF PROTECTING CA TAXPAYERS
SACBEE -- Teresa Casazza -
Friday, June 6, 2008
Today marks the
30th anniversary of Proposition 13, the landmark reform
that helped property owners and government alike by
making California's property tax system stable and
predictable. Proposition 13 has survived three decades
of legal challenges and nonstop attacks from those who
want to increase taxes, but it remains a crucial
protection for taxpayers.
A trip back in
time is warranted, since many current homeowners and
business owners never had to pay property taxes in the
pre-Proposition 13 era. Under the old system, property
was assessed every year, based on the county assessor's
estimate of current market value. There were many
problems, the most notable being that property taxes
skyrocketed when the housing market boomed – such as
when home prices more than doubled in Southern
California during a five-year span in the late 1970s –
making it impossible to predict one's property tax bill.
Compounding the
problems, assessors based their estimates not on what a
property actually was worth in its existing use, but
what it would be worth if it were used for its "highest
and best use." This is a very unfair and subjective
standard, based on an opinion of value.
Business owners
were hit hard, too. An entrepreneur could start a
business, hire employees and establish a prudent
operating budget, and then a massive, unforeseeable
increase in property taxes could wipe out the entire
operation overnight. (Today, some groups are agitating
for a "split roll" system that would remove Proposition
13's protection for businesses and return to the
discredited method of assessing property based on what
it might become, rather than what it is. The
multibillion-dollar tax hikes on businesses would lead
to higher consumer prices, layoffs and more bad news for
the economy.)
Property owners
had been complaining since the 1960s, and their
complaints escalated along with property values in the
1970s. When they were ignored by legislators, voters
took matters into their own hands in 1978 and approved
Proposition 13. The initiative succeeded because
property owners had had enough, and because sponsors
Howard Jarvis and Paul Gann didn't let the brutal
opposition campaign sap their resolve.
Proposition 13
reduced the tax rate, limited increases to no more than
2 percent a year, required a two-thirds vote for tax
increases and took the guesswork out of property taxes.
Buyers now know what their tax will be because it is
based on the purchase price, not an assessor's opinion
of market value.
There is another
major benefit. Since the passage of Proposition 13, the
amount of property taxes going to local government has
steadily increased every year, even when the real estate
market tanked.
The
increases, averaging 7.5 percent per year, are due
primarily to the turnover of property.
Consider a seller who bought a home in 1980 for
$150,000, the "base year" value for property taxes. If
the house sells today for $450,000, there is a reservoir
of $300,000 in value that now will be taxed. If the
homeowner is forced to drop the price to $350,000, local
government still will collect a windfall because the
assessed value will increase by $200,000.
Even last year, as the housing market withered, the
value of assessed properties in California increased 9.6
percent over the previous year, and the government
collected more property taxes.
If property still were being
reassessed annually at market value, local governments
would be facing major year-to-year swings in revenue.
Happy
anniversary, Proposition 13, and may you continue
protecting taxpayers and stabilizing local government's
primary source of revenue.
About the writer:
Teresa Casazza
is president of the California Taxpayers' Association, a
nonpartisan organization formed in 1926 to oppose
unnecessary taxes and to advocate for government
efficiency. Cal-Tax is online at
www.caltax.org.